2804, 2015

Highlights of April 28, 2015 Board Meeting

28, Apr, 2015|Comments Off on Highlights of April 28, 2015 Board Meeting

The Board reviewed  the proposed budget for 2015-2016.  The Board faces a number of challenges with the resources the Province has made available:

• EPSB is projecting enrolment growth of 3 per cent (more than 2,700 students) for 2015-
2016. With no funding for enrolment growth, EPSB is estimating the cost of educating
these additional students at $15.3 million.
• The base instruction grant rates have been segregated into two components, teacher
compensation and non-teacher compensation. The portion related to teacher compensation
has been increased by 2 per cent whereas the non-teacher compensation component has
been decreased by 3.1 per cent.
• Following three years of a salary freeze, the teacher’s collective agreement for 2015-2016
includes a 2 per cent increase in teacher compensation costs, and a 1 per cent lump sum
payment to teachers. The estimated cost to the District is approximately $12.5 million.
• Funding for children with severe disabilities/delays (Program Unit Funding) will be based
on the current year budget less 3.1 per cent and will not be adjusted for any increase related
to enrolment growth. The District is currently calculating the financial impact of this.
• The English as a Second Language, Equity of Opportunity, First Nations, Metis and Inuit
Education, Outreach Programs, Plant Operations and Maintenance, and Socio-Economic
Status grants have all been reduced by 3.1 per cent. The Inclusive Education and
Transportation grants have been reduced by 1.9 per cent and 1.4 per cent respectively. The
total impact of these reductions to the District is estimated to be a reduction of $4.8 million
in funding compared to the current year.
• As mandated by the Province, EPSB must end the current year with an accumulated surplus
from operations of $35.2 million. EPSB will only be able to access these funds during the
2015-2016 school year with Ministerial approval. Approval will only be granted if the
request supports strategies to transition away from the future use of reserves in order to
operate within the annual Provincial budget allocation by 2016-2017.
Therefore, the net funding impact, including projected increases in student enrolment of 3 per
cent, means the District will provide education services to just over 92,000 students with
reduced funding dollars and restrictions related to staffing options (unable to reduce front line
certificated FTE’s) and restrictions around its ability to access surplus funds (created by being
fiscally responsible over the prior years).

These restrictions may mean increased class sizes, reduced numbers of educational assistants and other non-teaching staff including specialized supports, greater pressures on teachers, and less opportunity for innovation through initiatives such as Career Pathways. These outcomes are the opposite of the priorities that the District heard from the recent survey that more than 3000 parents responded to.  Along with the advocacy of the Board, I ask that parents and community members make their concerns known to all candidates for the Provincial election.

The Board also received first reading of a proposed new policy on stakeholder relations.  Given the requirements of the new Education Act, the vision of Inspiring Education to strengthen student success through community partnerships, and the challenge of limited resources, this policy needs to carefully foster stakeholder relations. Please let me know your feedback on the proposed policy.

2404, 2015

Bessie Nichols School Council Meeting April 23, 2015

24, Apr, 2015|Comments Off on Bessie Nichols School Council Meeting April 23, 2015

Thanks to Shelley, Rebecca, the rest of Council and Principal Martyn for the invite to participate. I was able to provide an update, as follows:

1. Construction update

The 7-9 Lewis Farms – construction scheduled to start May 1

Granville – thanks to advocacy, now a full build (900 students) rather than starter school.  Occupancy target Dec 31, 2016

Capital plan reflects community input – will investigate new designs with smaller footprint (eg. that could fit the Glastonbury site if required); will determine over the next year the need for a new west end high school

2. Traffic – Board seeking to influence City decisions for the funds raised through photo radar to be used for school traffic concerns

3. Budget – while final budget will be post election, Board committed to focusing resources to support kids in classrooms

4. Strategic plan – District focused on enhancing collection and analysis of data, including parent feedback, to improve practice to support student success


2204, 2015

Glastonbury Community League AGM, April 21, 2015

22, Apr, 2015|Comments Off on Glastonbury Community League AGM, April 21, 2015

Thanks to President Jason and the rest of the League for the invitation to Edmonton Public Schools to present an update on the new Grange School approved for Granville neighborhood.

I want to commend the League Executive and Board for your successful advocacy to ensure the Grange school is fully built right away to accommodate 900 students, rather than as a 250 student “starter school” originally promised by the Provincial Government.  Together with MLA Matt Jeneroux, the Glastonbury Community League has been very effective at advocating for the schools so needed by the community.  Your neighbors are very fortunate to have you dedicated volunteers!